A Thai woman was blown away by an astronomical enhance in her electricity bill, with costs skyrocketing from an average of 60 baht per 30 days to an outrageous 11,357.47 baht. This occurred as a end result of what inspection personnel from the native electrical energy authority would later uncover as a faulty transformer in her fruit garden.
Umaphon Tedduang revealed her dilemma via a grievance submit on the ‘We are Consumers’ Facebook page, sharing that she usually receives an electrical energy invoice of approximately 60 baht every month; the highest previously recorded was seven hundred baht. But final month, she was astounded to obtain a bill of 11,357.forty seven baht for her fruit garden’s electrical energy supply.
Taken aback by the sudden surge as a end result of faulty transformer, she and her father complained with the electrical energy division, but there was no quick motion. They guessed it may be due to the extended national vacation and waited patiently, however there was no decision or inspection.
As her concern grew, she decided to share her predicament on the ‘We are Consumers’ Facebook web page, hoping to seek out others who might have confronted similar points.
After a energetic debate on the submit, the native electrical energy authority sent technicians for a check and discovered a defective transformer was releasing extra electricity than ordinary. This was the doubtless offender in the abnormal surge in her electrical energy invoice. The technicians replaced the faulty transformer however left with out clarifying how the inflated bill would be handled reviews KhaoSod.
Umaphon was understandably upset as a result of inconvenience attributable to the defective transformer. Basic was not supplied an apology or a solution, and he or she was told to pay the bill of 11,357.forty seven baht, which she staunchly refuses to do.
She sees no cause why she should be held accountable for the utility company’s negligence, notably as she believes an inspector visits the transformer every month. She cast doubts over whether or not the inspections were thorough or just superficial and whether any damage was detected but ignored..